Trust and verification
Verified hashes, stronger trust profiles, and lower-risk releases rise faster in the shortlist.
Ranked decision page
Mostrando 12 risultati
Share via HTTP
Use this track when you want safer, fresher, or leaner substitutes for a specific Android app.
Mostrando 12 risultati
Privacy guardrails first
Fresh releases matter
Page context
File Transfer
Share via HTTP Download APK v2.17 | File Transfer è elencato in File Transfer e pubblicato da Marcos Diez. Questa pagina è scritta come una recensione editori.
Trust score: 64
Risk: Rischio medio
Size: 4.5 MB
How this track ranks apps
These pages are not alphabetical lists. Each track emphasizes a different decision priority.
Release freshness
More recent releases usually rank better because users need options that are still maintained.
Footprint and install size
Smaller packages score better when the track is sensitive to storage, bandwidth, or device overhead.
Ranked options
Ordered using trust, risk, footprint, freshness, and category fit signals.
#1
Sweet IPFS
Sweet IPFS is worth comparing against Share via HTTP when you want a similar category fit with a footprint around 3.2 MB.
Sweet IPFS Download APK v0.2 | File Transfer è elencato in File Transfer e pubblicato da hazae41. Questa pagina è scritta come una recensione editoriale, non.
Priority score: 64
Trust score: 70
Risk: Rischio medio
Dangerous permissions: 2
Size: 3.2 MB
1 versions tracked
#2
OnionShare
OnionShare is worth comparing against Share via HTTP when you want a similar category fit with a footprint around 16.6 MB.
OnionShare Download APK v0.2.3-beta | File Transfer è elencato in File Transfer e pubblicato da Sviluppatore sconosciuto. Questa pagina è scritta come una rec.
Priority score: 63
Trust score: 83
Risk: Rischio basso
Dangerous permissions: 1
Size: 16.6 MB
1 versions tracked
#3
Send With FTP
Send With FTP is worth comparing against Share via HTTP when you want a similar category fit with a footprint around 0.1 MB.
Send With FTP Download APK v1.2.2 | File Transfer è elencato in File Transfer e pubblicato da Michael Totschnig. Questa pagina è scritta come una recensione e.
Priority score: 62
Trust score: 63
Risk: Rischio medio
Dangerous permissions: 1
Size: 0.1 MB
1 versions tracked
#4
Custom Uploader
Custom Uploader is worth comparing against Share via HTTP when you want a similar category fit with a footprint around 60.2 MB.
Custom Uploader Download APK v2.1.1 | File Transfer è elencato in File Transfer e pubblicato da Nyx. Questa pagina è scritta come una recensione editoriale, n.
Priority score: 60
Trust score: 74
Risk: Rischio medio
Dangerous permissions: 0
Size: 60.2 MB
1 versions tracked
#5
Destiny
Destiny is worth comparing against Share via HTTP when you want a similar category fit with a footprint around 24.0 MB.
Destiny Download APK v1.0.3 | File Transfer è elencato in File Transfer e pubblicato da Least Authority TFA GmbH. Questa pagina è scritta come una recensione.
Priority score: 59
Trust score: 71
Risk: Rischio medio
Dangerous permissions: 0
Size: 24.0 MB
1 versions tracked
#6
ToFShare
ToFShare is worth comparing against Share via HTTP when you want a similar category fit with a footprint around 77.6 MB.
ToFShare Download APK v1.0.10 | File Transfer è elencato in File Transfer e pubblicato da Zoff. Questa pagina è scritta come una recensione editoriale, non co.
Priority score: 56
Trust score: 67
Risk: Rischio medio
Dangerous permissions: 4
Size: 77.6 MB
1 versions tracked
#7
Warpinator (unofficial)
Warpinator (unofficial) is worth comparing against Share via HTTP when you want a similar category fit with a footprint around 8.6 MB.
Warpinator (unofficial) Download APK v1.9 | File Transfer è elencato in File Transfer e pubblicato da Sviluppatore sconosciuto. Questa pagina è scritta come u.
Priority score: 55
Trust score: 71
Risk: Rischio medio
Dangerous permissions: 0
Size: 8.6 MB
1 versions tracked
#8
Zorin Connect
Zorin Connect is worth comparing against Share via HTTP when you want a similar category fit with a footprint around 7.7 MB.
Zorin Connect Download APK v1.33.4 | File Transfer è elencato in File Transfer e pubblicato da Sviluppatore sconosciuto. Questa pagina è scritta come una rece.
Priority score: 55
Trust score: 71
Risk: Rischio medio
Dangerous permissions: 0
Size: 7.7 MB
1 versions tracked
#9
Wormhole
Wormhole is worth comparing against Share via HTTP when you want a similar category fit with a footprint around 25.7 MB.
Wormhole Download APK v0.2.1 | File Transfer è elencato in File Transfer e pubblicato da pavelsof. Questa pagina è scritta come una recensione editoriale, non.
Priority score: 54
Trust score: 63
Risk: Rischio medio
Dangerous permissions: 0
Size: 25.7 MB
Release freshness: 6242 giorni fa
1 versions tracked
#10
croc
croc is worth comparing against Share via HTTP when you want a similar category fit with a footprint around 148.8 MB.
croc Download APK v10.3.1 | File Transfer è elencato in File Transfer e pubblicato da Chris Howey. Questa pagina è scritta come una recensione editoriale, non.
Priority score: 54
Trust score: 58
Risk: Rischio medio
Dangerous permissions: 0
Size: 148.8 MB
1 versions tracked
#11
LinxShare
LinxShare is worth comparing against Share via HTTP when you want a similar category fit with a footprint around 3.5 MB.
LinxShare Download APK v1.5 | File Transfer è elencato in File Transfer e pubblicato da Sviluppatore sconosciuto. Questa pagina è scritta come una recensione.
Priority score: 34
Size: 3.5 MB
2 versions tracked
#12
KDE Connect
KDE Connect is worth comparing against Share via HTTP when you want a similar category fit with a footprint around 6.2 MB.
KDE Connect Download APK v1.35.5 | File Transfer è elencato in File Transfer e pubblicato da Sviluppatore sconosciuto. Questa pagina è scritta come una recens.
Priority score: 30
Size: 6.2 MB
4 versions tracked
Questions users ask before choosing
Short answers for the trade-offs behind each library track.
When should I use alternatives pages for Share via HTTP?
Use this track when you already know the app you want to replace and need practical substitutes quickly.
What decides the order on an alternatives page?
The ordering favors safer trust context, fresher releases, cleaner permission signals, and useful differentiation from the current pick.
What is the main trade-off in alternatives pages?
The goal is not to find the most popular app overall, but the most credible replacement for the specific app you started from.
Explore another decision track
Switch lenses without leaving the category or app research flow.
55 best-of pages
Best Of
Use this track when you want the strongest all-around shortlist for a category, not just a single app swap.
55 privacy pages
Privacy
Use this track when permission minimization, risk context, and verification clarity matter more than raw popularity.
55 lightweight pages
Lightweight
Use this track when you need smaller installs and lower overhead without dropping trust context entirely.