Trust and verification
Verified hashes, stronger trust profiles, and lower-risk releases rise faster in the shortlist.
Ranked decision page
Showing 12 results
Share via HTTP
Use this track when you want safer, fresher, or leaner substitutes for a specific Android app.
Showing 12 results
Privacy guardrails first
Fresh releases matter
Page context
File Transfer
Share via HTTP is an Android app in File Transfer with a clean, verified release timeline. Release snapshot: Latest version: 2.17 | Size: 4.5 MB | Category: File Transfer | Target SDK 35 | Min SDK 14 | Package: com.Marc...
Trust score: 64
Risk: Medium risk
Size: 4.5 MB
How this track ranks apps
These pages are not alphabetical lists. Each track emphasizes a different decision priority.
Release freshness
More recent releases usually rank better because users need options that are still maintained.
Footprint and install size
Smaller packages score better when the track is sensitive to storage, bandwidth, or device overhead.
Ranked options
Ordered using trust, risk, footprint, freshness, and category fit signals.
#1
Sweet IPFS
Sweet IPFS is worth comparing against Share via HTTP when you want a similar category fit with a footprint around 3.2 MB.
Sweet IPFS for Android (File Transfer) with version history and verified package details. Release snapshot: Latest version: 0.2 | Min SDK 21 | Target SDK 27 | Category: File Trans...
Priority score: 64
Trust score: 70
Risk: Medium risk
Dangerous permissions: 2
Size: 3.2 MB
1 versions tracked
#2
OnionShare
OnionShare is worth comparing against Share via HTTP when you want a similar category fit with a footprint around 16.6 MB.
A closer look at OnionShare: release details and update history in File Transfer. Release snapshot: Latest version: 0.2.3-beta | Size: 16.6 MB | Package: org.onionshare.android.fd...
Priority score: 63
Trust score: 83
Risk: Low risk
Dangerous permissions: 1
Size: 16.6 MB
1 versions tracked
#3
Send With FTP
Send With FTP is worth comparing against Share via HTTP when you want a similar category fit with a footprint around 0.1 MB.
Manage your FTP(S) URIs within the app and share files via the Android Share Menu. Release snapshot: Updated: 2001-06-19 | Package: org.totschnig.sendwithftp | Target SDK 16 | Siz...
Priority score: 62
Trust score: 63
Risk: Medium risk
Dangerous permissions: 1
Size: 0.1 MB
1 versions tracked
#4
Custom Uploader
Custom Uploader is worth comparing against Share via HTTP when you want a similar category fit with a footprint around 60.2 MB.
A closer look at Custom Uploader: release details and update history in File Transfer. Release snapshot: Min SDK 24 | Package: com.nyx.custom_uploader | Target SDK 36 | Developer:...
Priority score: 60
Trust score: 74
Risk: Medium risk
Dangerous permissions: 0
Size: 60.2 MB
1 versions tracked
#5
Destiny
Destiny is worth comparing against Share via HTTP when you want a similar category fit with a footprint around 24.0 MB.
A closer look at Destiny: release details and update history in File Transfer. Release snapshot: Target SDK 31 | Size: 24 MB | Developer: Least Authority TFA GmbH | Latest version...
Priority score: 59
Trust score: 71
Risk: Medium risk
Dangerous permissions: 0
Size: 24.0 MB
1 versions tracked
#6
ToFShare
ToFShare is worth comparing against Share via HTTP when you want a similar category fit with a footprint around 77.6 MB.
ToFShare - Share Files via Tox A way to easily share files via Tox. Release snapshot: Target SDK 33 | Category: File Transfer | ABI arm64-v8a, armeabi-v7a, x86, x86_64 | Package:...
Priority score: 56
Trust score: 67
Risk: Medium risk
Dangerous permissions: 4
Size: 77.6 MB
1 versions tracked
#7
Warpinator (unofficial)
Warpinator (unofficial) is worth comparing against Share via HTTP when you want a similar category fit with a footprint around 8.6 MB.
Explore Warpinator for Android (unofficial) in File Transfer with trusted metadata and a tracked update histor Release snapshot: Size: 8.6 MB | ABI arm64-v8a, armeabi-v7a, x86, x8...
Priority score: 55
Trust score: 71
Risk: Medium risk
Dangerous permissions: 0
Size: 8.6 MB
1 versions tracked
#8
Zorin Connect
Zorin Connect is worth comparing against Share via HTTP when you want a similar category fit with a footprint around 7.7 MB.
A closer look at Zorin Connect: release details and update history in File Transfer. Release snapshot: Package: com.zorinos.zorin_connect | Updated: 2001-08-26 | Min SDK 21 | Late...
Priority score: 55
Trust score: 71
Risk: Medium risk
Dangerous permissions: 0
Size: 7.7 MB
1 versions tracked
#9
Wormhole
Wormhole is worth comparing against Share via HTTP when you want a similar category fit with a footprint around 25.7 MB.
A closer look at Wormhole: release details and update history in File Transfer. Release snapshot: Size: 25.7 MB | Target SDK 29 | Updated: 2009-02-04 | Latest version: 0.2.1 | ABI...
Priority score: 54
Trust score: 63
Risk: Medium risk
Dangerous permissions: 0
Size: 25.7 MB
Release freshness: 6242 days ago
1 versions tracked
#10
croc
croc is worth comparing against Share via HTTP when you want a similar category fit with a footprint around 148.8 MB.
croc for Android (File Transfer) with version history and verified package details. Release snapshot: ABI arm64-v8a, armeabi-v7a, x86, x86_64 | Size: 148.8 MB | Target SDK 29 | La...
Priority score: 54
Trust score: 58
Risk: Medium risk
Dangerous permissions: 0
Size: 148.8 MB
1 versions tracked
#11
LinxShare
LinxShare is worth comparing against Share via HTTP when you want a similar category fit with a footprint around 3.5 MB.
Share images on your device with others through your self-hosted linx server On LinxShare is an app to share images on Release snapshot: Latest version: 1.5 | Updated: 2003-12-30...
Priority score: 34
Size: 3.5 MB
2 versions tracked
#12
KDE Connect
KDE Connect is worth comparing against Share via HTTP when you want a similar category fit with a footprint around 6.2 MB.
KDE Connect provides a set of features to integrate your workflow across devices: - Transfer files between your device Release snapshot: Updated: 2005-06-13 | Min SDK 23 | Package...
Priority score: 30
Size: 6.2 MB
4 versions tracked
Questions users ask before choosing
Short answers for the trade-offs behind each library track.
When should I use alternatives pages for Share via HTTP?
Use this track when you already know the app you want to replace and need practical substitutes quickly.
What decides the order on an alternatives page?
The ordering favors safer trust context, fresher releases, cleaner permission signals, and useful differentiation from the current pick.
What is the main trade-off in alternatives pages?
The goal is not to find the most popular app overall, but the most credible replacement for the specific app you started from.
Explore another decision track
Switch lenses without leaving the category or app research flow.
55 best-of pages
Best Of
Use this track when you want the strongest all-around shortlist for a category, not just a single app swap.
55 privacy pages
Privacy
Use this track when permission minimization, risk context, and verification clarity matter more than raw popularity.
55 lightweight pages
Lightweight
Use this track when you need smaller installs and lower overhead without dropping trust context entirely.