Trusted APK Intelligence APKs Center 신뢰할 수 있는 Android 릴리스 인텔리전스
Ranked decision page
31 active apps

Koofr Vault

Use this track when you want safer, fresher, or leaner substitutes for a specific Android app.
31 active apps Privacy guardrails first Fresh releases matter
Page context
Cloud Storage & File Sync

카테고리: Cloud Storage & File Sync. 릴리스 요약: ABI arm64-v8a, armeabi-v7a, x86, x86_64 | 패키지: net.koofr.vault | 대상 SDK 35 | 최신 버전: 0.1.22 | 최소 SDK 23 | 업데이트됨: 2002-06-02. APK 신뢰 패스포트: 신뢰 점수...

Size: 64.4 MB
How this track ranks apps
These pages are not alphabetical lists. Each track emphasizes a different decision priority.

Trust and verification

Verified hashes, stronger trust profiles, and lower-risk releases rise faster in the shortlist.

Release freshness

More recent releases usually rank better because users need options that are still maintained.

Footprint and install size

Smaller packages score better when the track is sensitive to storage, bandwidth, or device overhead.

Ranked options
Ordered using trust, risk, footprint, freshness, and category fit signals.
#1

Filester

Filester is worth comparing against Koofr Vault when you want a similar category fit with a footprint around 8.2 MB.

카테고리: Cloud Storage & File Sync. 릴리스 요약: 최신 버전: 2.3.4 | 크기: 8.2 MB | 대상 SDK 35 | 패키지: com.roozbehzarei.filester | 카테고리: Cloud Storage & File Sync | 업데이...

Priority score: 67 Trust score: 81 Risk: 낮은 위험 Dangerous permissions: 1 Size: 8.2 MB 1 versions tracked
#2

EasySync

EasySync is worth comparing against Koofr Vault when you want a similar category fit with a footprint around 1.9 MB.

A closer look at EasySync: release details and update history in Cloud Storage & File Sync. 릴리스 요약: 카테고리: Cloud Storage & File Sync | 최신 버전: 1.22 | 패키지: com.phpbg....

Priority score: 59 Trust score: 72 Risk: 중간 위험 Dangerous permissions: 0 Size: 1.9 MB 1 versions tracked
#3

Zimly S3 Backup

Zimly S3 Backup is worth comparing against Koofr Vault when you want a similar category fit with a footprint around 9.5 MB.

Zimly S3 Backup for Android (Cloud Storage & File Sync) with version history and verified package details. 릴리스 요약: ABI arm64-v8a, armeabi-v7a, x86, x86_64 | 패키지: app.zimly...

Priority score: 59 Trust score: 77 Risk: 중간 위험 Dangerous permissions: 4 Size: 9.5 MB 1 versions tracked
#4

Cryptomator

Cryptomator is worth comparing against Koofr Vault when you want a similar category fit with a footprint around 19.6 MB.

카테고리: Cloud Storage & File Sync. 릴리스 요약: 대상 SDK 35 | 최소 SDK 26 | 패키지: org.cryptomator.lite | 개발자: Skymatic GmbH | 크기: 19.6 MB | 카테고리: Cloud Storage & File...

Priority score: 58 Trust score: 72 Risk: 중간 위험 Dangerous permissions: 0 Size: 19.6 MB 1 versions tracked
#5

FTPClient

FTPClient is worth comparing against Koofr Vault when you want a similar category fit with a footprint around 9.7 MB.

A closer look at FTPClient: release details and update history in Cloud Storage & File Sync. 릴리스 요약: 대상 SDK 35 | 업데이트됨: 2007-05-07 | 패키지: de.qwerty287.ftpclient |...

Priority score: 58 Trust score: 69 Risk: 중간 위험 Dangerous permissions: 0 Size: 9.7 MB 1 versions tracked
#6

Rsync Server

Rsync Server is worth comparing against Koofr Vault when you want a similar category fit with a footprint around 2.8 MB.

카테고리: Cloud Storage & File Sync. 릴리스 요약: 대상 SDK 33 | 업데이트됨: 2005-02-17 | 크기: 2.8 MB | 카테고리: Cloud Storage & File Sync | 최신 버전: 0.9.10 | 패키지: com.githu...

Priority score: 58 Trust score: 69 Risk: 중간 위험 Dangerous permissions: 0 Size: 2.8 MB 1 versions tracked
#7

SambaLite

SambaLite is worth comparing against Koofr Vault when you want a similar category fit with a footprint around 14.3 MB.

SambaLite는 클라우드 스토리지 및 파일 동기화 기능을 제공하는 Android 앱으로, 깔끔하고 검증된 출시 일정을 가지고 있습니 릴리스 요약: 업데이트됨: 2001-12-13 | 개발자: egdels | 크기:...

Priority score: 58 Trust score: 72 Risk: 중간 위험 Dangerous permissions: 0 Size: 14.3 MB 1 versions tracked
#8

Seafile

Seafile is worth comparing against Koofr Vault when you want a similar category fit with a footprint around 14.4 MB.

A closer look at Seafile: release details and update history in Cloud Storage & File Sync. 릴리스 요약: 크기: 14.4 MB | 최신 버전: 3.0.21 | 대상 SDK 35 | 업데이트됨: 2007-06-27 |...

Priority score: 58 Trust score: 72 Risk: 중간 위험 Dangerous permissions: 0 Size: 14.4 MB 1 versions tracked
#9

DecSync CC

DecSync CC is worth comparing against Koofr Vault when you want a similar category fit with a footprint around 7.3 MB.

DecSync CC for Android (Cloud Storage & File Sync) with version history and verified package details. 릴리스 요약: 카테고리: Cloud Storage & File Sync | 업데이트됨: 2003-10-22 |...

Priority score: 57 Trust score: 66 Risk: 중간 위험 Dangerous permissions: 0 Size: 7.3 MB 1 versions tracked
#10

Round Sync - Rclone

Round Sync - Rclone is worth comparing against Koofr Vault when you want a similar category fit with a footprint around 32.6 MB.

버전 컨텍스트가 명확한 검증된 미러 중에서 선택하세요. 릴리스 요약: 최소 SDK 23 | 대상 SDK 34 | ABI x86_64 | 패키지: de.felixnuesse.extract | 업데이트됨: 2006-11-15 | 크기: 32.6 MB...

Priority score: 57 Trust score: 69 Risk: 중간 위험 Dangerous permissions: 0 Size: 32.6 MB 1 versions tracked
#11

Stingle Photos

Stingle Photos is worth comparing against Koofr Vault when you want a similar category fit with a footprint around 11.6 MB.

Stingle Photos for Android (Cloud Storage & File Sync) with version history and verified package details. 릴리스 요약: 패키지: org.stingle.photos | ABI arm64-v8a, armeabi, armeabi...

Priority score: 57 Trust score: 69 Risk: 중간 위험 Dangerous permissions: 0 Size: 11.6 MB 1 versions tracked
#12

Syncthing-Lite

Syncthing-Lite is worth comparing against Koofr Vault when you want a similar category fit with a footprint around 17.2 MB.

github.catfriend1.syncthinglite . 릴리스 요약: 크기: 17.2 MB | ABI arm64-v8a, armeabi-v7a, x86, x86_64 | 패키지: com.github.catfriend1.syncthinglite | 대상 SDK 36 | 최소 SDK 23 |...

Priority score: 57 Trust score: 69 Risk: 중간 위험 Dangerous permissions: 0 Size: 17.2 MB 1 versions tracked
Questions users ask before choosing
Short answers for the trade-offs behind each library track.

When should I use alternatives pages for Koofr Vault?

Use this track when you already know the app you want to replace and need practical substitutes quickly.

What decides the order on an alternatives page?

The ordering favors safer trust context, fresher releases, cleaner permission signals, and useful differentiation from the current pick.

What is the main trade-off in alternatives pages?

The goal is not to find the most popular app overall, but the most credible replacement for the specific app you started from.

Explore another decision track
Switch lenses without leaving the category or app research flow.
55 best-of pages

Best Of

Use this track when you want the strongest all-around shortlist for a category, not just a single app swap.

55 privacy pages

Privacy

Use this track when permission minimization, risk context, and verification clarity matter more than raw popularity.

55 lightweight pages

Lightweight

Use this track when you need smaller installs and lower overhead without dropping trust context entirely.