Trust and verification
Verified hashes, stronger trust profiles, and lower-risk releases rise faster in the shortlist.
Ranked decision page
304 active apps
ShareX
Use this track when you want safer, fresher, or leaner substitutes for a specific Android app.
304 active apps
Privacy guardrails first
Fresh releases matter
How this track ranks apps
These pages are not alphabetical lists. Each track emphasizes a different decision priority.
Release freshness
More recent releases usually rank better because users need options that are still maintained.
Footprint and install size
Smaller packages score better when the track is sensitive to storage, bandwidth, or device overhead.
Ranked options
Ordered using trust, risk, footprint, freshness, and category fit signals.
#1
Odin
Odin is worth comparing against ShareX when you want a similar category fit with a footprint around 4.2 MB.
Odin for Android (Connectivity) with version history and verified package details. リリース概要: 最小 SDK 29 | ABI arm64-v8a, armeabi-v7a, x86, x86_64 | 最新バージョン: 3.6.0 | 更...
Priority score: 70
Trust score: 90
Risk: 低リスク
Dangerous permissions: 0
Size: 4.2 MB
1 versions tracked
#2
Private DNS Quick Tile
Private DNS Quick Tile is worth comparing against ShareX when you want a similar category fit with a footprint around 0.3 MB.
In order to change the Private DNS settings, this app requires the WRITE_SECURE_SETTINGS permission. リリース概要: カテゴリ: Connectivity | 開発者: Joshua Wolfsohn | ターゲット SD...
Priority score: 68
Trust score: 84
Risk: 低リスク
Dangerous permissions: 0
Size: 0.3 MB
1 versions tracked
#3
BLE Manager
BLE Manager is worth comparing against ShareX when you want a similar category fit with a footprint around 4.5 MB.
A closer look at BLE Manager: release details and update history in Connectivity. リリース概要: パッケージ: net.satka.bleManager | ターゲット SDK 35 | 最新バージョン: 19 | 開発者:...
Priority score: 67
Trust score: 84
Risk: 低リスク
Dangerous permissions: 2
Size: 4.5 MB
1 versions tracked
#4
Child Monitor
Child Monitor is worth comparing against ShareX when you want a similar category fit with a footprint around 1.3 MB.
An Open Source Child Monitor for Android Child Monitor allows two Android devices to act as a baby monitor. リリース概要: サイズ: 1.3 MB | パッケージ: de.rochefort.childmonitor |...
Priority score: 67
Trust score: 81
Risk: 低リスク
Dangerous permissions: 1
Size: 1.3 MB
1 versions tracked
#5
DozeOff
DozeOff is worth comparing against ShareX when you want a similar category fit with a footprint around 0.1 MB.
明確なバージョン コンテキストを持つ検証済みのミラーから選択します。. リリース概要: サイズ: 60.6 KB | ターゲット SDK 29 | パッケージ: com.dosse.dozeoff | 最小 SDK 23 | カテゴリ: Co...
Priority score: 67
Trust score: 81
Risk: 低リスク
Dangerous permissions: 0
Size: 0.1 MB
1 versions tracked
#6
Enhanced Music Controller Lite
Enhanced Music Controller Lite is worth comparing against ShareX when you want a similar category fit with a footprint around 4.1 MB.
A closer look at Enhanced Music Controller Lite: release details and update history in Connectivity. リリース概要: ターゲット SDK 35 | 更新日: 2001-08-19 | カテゴリ: Connectivity...
Priority score: 67
Trust score: 80
Risk: 低リスク
Dangerous permissions: 0
Size: 4.1 MB
1 versions tracked
#7
Mensa-Guthaben
Mensa-Guthaben is worth comparing against ShareX when you want a similar category fit with a footprint around 1.6 MB.
NFC メンサ・カードの残高をチェック 最小 SDK 14. リリース概要: パッケージ: de.yazo_games.mensaguthaben | カテゴリ: Connectivity | 開発者: Jakob Wenzel | 最小 SDK 14 | 最新バージョ...
Priority score: 67
Trust score: 80
Risk: 低リスク
Dangerous permissions: 0
Size: 1.6 MB
1 versions tracked
#8
SoundRemote
SoundRemote is worth comparing against ShareX when you want a similar category fit with a footprint around 3.4 MB.
明確なバージョン コンテキストを持つ検証済みのミラーから選択します。. リリース概要: 最小 SDK 21 | カテゴリ: Connectivity | サイズ: 3.4 MB | ターゲット SDK 35 | パッケージ: io.githu...
Priority score: 67
Trust score: 81
Risk: 低リスク
Dangerous permissions: 1
Size: 3.4 MB
1 versions tracked
#9
AVNC
AVNC is worth comparing against ShareX when you want a similar category fit with a footprint around 6.7 MB.
明確なバージョン コンテキストを持つ検証済みのミラーから選択します。. リリース概要: 開発者: Gaurav Ujjwal | ABI arm64-v8a, armeabi-v7a, x86, x86_64 | カテゴリ: Connectivity | ター...
Priority score: 66
Trust score: 87
Risk: 低リスク
Dangerous permissions: 0
Size: 6.7 MB
Release freshness: 5931日前
1 versions tracked
#10
DCC++Throttle
DCC++Throttle is worth comparing against ShareX when you want a similar category fit with a footprint around 4.9 MB.
DCC++Throttle for Android (Connectivity) with version history and verified package details. リリース概要: 開発者: aleksandr.ru | 最新バージョン: 1.4 | パッケージ: ru.aleksandr.dcc...
Priority score: 66
Trust score: 78
Risk: 低リスク
Dangerous permissions: 2
Size: 4.9 MB
1 versions tracked
#11
Home App | For Philips Hue, Arduino & more
Home App | For Philips Hue, Arduino & more is worth comparing against ShareX when you want a similar category fit with a footprint around 2.4 MB.
For Philips Hue, Arduino & more for Android (Connectivity) with version history and verified package details. リリース概要: パッケージ: io.github.domi04151309.home | カテゴリ: Con...
Priority score: 66
Trust score: 81
Risk: 低リスク
Dangerous permissions: 2
Size: 2.4 MB
1 versions tracked
#12
ANONguard
ANONguard is worth comparing against ShareX when you want a similar category fit with a footprint around 6.6 MB.
パッケージ: anonvpn.anon_next.android. リリース概要: 最小 SDK 21 | パッケージ: anonvpn.anon_next.android | サイズ: 6.6 MB | 更新日: 2009-05-07 | 開発者: JAP-Team | ターゲット SDK...
Priority score: 65
Trust score: 84
Risk: 低リスク
Dangerous permissions: 0
Size: 6.6 MB
Release freshness: 6149日前
1 versions tracked
Related editorial comparisons
Use these deeper articles when you need scoring logic and editorial verdicts.
Featured
3 apps compared
Android browsers: speed vs privacy comparison
A balanced browser comparison using startup metrics, memory pressure, tracker risk, and safe default settings.
Questions users ask before choosing
Short answers for the trade-offs behind each library track.
When should I use alternatives pages for ShareX?
Use this track when you already know the app you want to replace and need practical substitutes quickly.
What decides the order on an alternatives page?
The ordering favors safer trust context, fresher releases, cleaner permission signals, and useful differentiation from the current pick.
What is the main trade-off in alternatives pages?
The goal is not to find the most popular app overall, but the most credible replacement for the specific app you started from.
Explore another decision track
Switch lenses without leaving the category or app research flow.
55 best-of pages
Best Of
Use this track when you want the strongest all-around shortlist for a category, not just a single app swap.
55 privacy pages
Privacy
Use this track when permission minimization, risk context, and verification clarity matter more than raw popularity.
55 lightweight pages
Lightweight
Use this track when you need smaller installs and lower overhead without dropping trust context entirely.